Initial construction XIIe siècle (≈ 1250)
Original Romanesque building erected.
XVIe siècle
Destruction
Destruction XVIe siècle (≈ 1650)
Religion wars damage the church.
XVIIe siècle
Reconstruction
Reconstruction XVIIe siècle (≈ 1750)
Façade and portal redone.
début XIXe siècle
Added retable
Added retable début XIXe siècle (≈ 1904)
Late interior dressing.
3 août 2000
MH classification
MH classification 3 août 2000 (≈ 2000)
Registration as a historical monument.
Aujourd'hui
Aujourd'hui
Aujourd'hui Aujourd'hui (≈ 2025)
Position de référence.
Heritage classified
Former church (Cd. C 70): inscription by decree of 3 August 2000
Key figures
Information non disponible - No character cited
Missing sources on historical actors.
Origin and history
The church of St Andrew of Belvézet, located in the Gard in the Occitanie region, is a Romanesque building built in the 12th century. This religious monument, typical of the medieval architecture of the Languedoc, suffered major destruction during the wars of Religion (16th century), a conflict that opposed Catholics and Protestants in the Kingdom of France. These clashes, particularly violent in Languedoc, left many churches in ruins or deeply damaged.
The reconstruction of the church took place in the 17th century, with a notable overhaul of its façade and portal, adopting post-medieval stylistic elements. The interior decorations, probably added in the eighteenth century, contrast with the initial Romanesque sobriety. A retable of the early 19th century shows a late beautification, while the exterior retains a rustic appearance, marked by teeth of gear in decor. These characteristics illustrate the successive adaptations of the building to the liturgical and aesthetic needs of times.
Ranked among the Historical Monuments since 3 August 2000 (inscription order for the old church, Parcellaire C 70), the property today belongs to the municipality of Belvézet. Its history reflects the religious and political upheavals of the region, while embodying the resilience of local communities. The approximate location (note: 5/10) and the lack of details on its current accessibility underline its anchoring in a preserved rural territory, far from major tourist routes.