Headquarters of Soult février 1814 (≈ 1814)
Occupation by Soult and Wellington.
4e quart du XVIIIe siècle
Construction of hotel
Construction of hotel 4e quart du XVIIIe siècle (≈ 1887)
Period of initial construction of the monument.
12 juillet 1973
Historical Monument
Historical Monument 12 juillet 1973 (≈ 1973)
Registration of facades and roofs.
Aujourd'hui
Aujourd'hui
Aujourd'hui Aujourd'hui (≈ 2025)
Position de référence.
Heritage classified
Facade and roofing on street (Case AD 126): inscription by order of 12 July 1973
Key figures
Général Soult - French military
It established its headquarters in 1814.
Lord Wellington - British General
Occupying the hotel instead of Soult.
Origin and history
The Hotel de La Belle Hôtesse, built in the fourth quarter of the eighteenth century in Orthez (New Aquitaine), is an example of refined civil architecture of this period. Its facade, without superfluous ornaments, is distinguished by a staggered portal, a stone bench and wrought iron poternes supporting signs and lanterns. The floors, separated by flats and a protruding cornice, reflect a classic balance between geometric rigor and discreet elegance. The inner courtyard takes over the vertical divisions of the facade on street, without additional decoration, highlighting a sober architectural unit.
In February 1814, the hotel played a historic role during the Napoleonic wars. General Soult, returning from Spain, established his headquarters there, confident in a forthcoming victory. He even ordered a meal for the evening, but it was finally Lord Wellington, his opponent, who occupied the place and enjoyed the prepared meal. This episode illustrates the rapid reversal of this troubled period, while anchoring the monument in local memory as a witness to European conflicts.
Ranked a Historic Monument since 1973 (registration of facades and roofs on street), the hotel now belongs to a private company. Its state of conservation and current use (visits, rental, accommodation) remain unspecified in available sources. The location, although documented (49 or 71 rue Saint-Gilles), is considered to be of poor accuracy (note 5/10), perhaps reflecting uncertainties about its exact location or access.