Logo Musée du Patrimoine

All French heritage classified by regions, departments and cities

Crucuno Quadrilatere à Plouharnel dans le Morbihan

Morbihan

Crucuno Quadrilatere

    35 Crucuno
    56340 Plouharnel
Quadrilatère de Crucuno
Quadrilatère de Crucuno
Quadrilatère de Crucuno
Quadrilatère de Crucuno
Quadrilatère de Crucuno
Quadrilatère de Crucuno
Quadrilatère de Crucuno
Quadrilatère de Crucuno
Quadrilatère de Crucuno
Quadrilatère de Crucuno
Quadrilatère de Crucuno
Quadrilatère de Crucuno
Crédit photo : calaeco - Sous licence Creative Commons

Timeline

Néolithique
Âge du Bronze
Âge du Fer
Antiquité
Haut Moyen Âge
Moyen Âge central
Bas Moyen Âge
Renaissance
Temps modernes
Révolution/Empire
XIXe siècle
Époque contemporaine
4100 av. J.-C.
4000 av. J.-C.
0
1800
1900
2000
Néolithique
Initial construction
1832
First known survey
1883
Controversial restoration
1889
Historical monument classification
1973
Discovery of central slabs
Aujourd'hui
Aujourd'hui

Heritage classified

Quadrilatère de Crucuno (Box B 192): classification by list of 1889

Key figures

M. Vicars - Archaeologist Author of the first survey in 1832.
Félix Gaillard - Restaurant operator of the site Modified the shape in 1883.
A. Thom - Researcher Signal of central slabs in 1973.

Origin and history

The Crucuno Quadrilateral, also known as Crucuno Cromlech, is a megalithic monument located in the village of Crucuno, in Plouharnel, Morbihan. Dated from Neolithic, it is often presented as an astronomical observatory, although this interpretation is based on a controversial restoration carried out in 1883 by Félix Gaillard. The latter modified the arrangement of the stones to give them a perfect rectangular shape, oriented according to the cardinal points and solstice, while the earlier surveys suggested a more complex and extensive configuration.

The first known survey of the site, carried out in 1832 by Mr. Vicars, mentions 36 monoliths organized in 7 queues. In 1847, Cayot-Delandre described a group of menhirs arranged in a confused manner, while a plan of 1883, post-restoration, showed 22 stones without a central element. In 1973, two central slabs, revealed by erosion, were reported by A. Thom. These variations highlight the transformations of the site, whose original area was probably four times larger, with about fifty monoliths.

Ranked a historic monument in 1889, the Crucuno quadrilateral illustrates the debates on archaeological interpretations. The astronomical theories advanced since the 19th century are based on a criticized restoration, questioning their scientific validity. Pre-1883 records, such as cadastral surveys, indicate that the site had a trapezoidal or irregular form, far from the current rectangle. This complex history makes it an important example of the challenges of conserving the megalithic heritage.

External links