Construction of the castle 1ère moitié du XVIIe siècle (≈ 1750)
Initial construction period documented
8 décembre 1981
Registration of communes
Registration of communes 8 décembre 1981 (≈ 1981)
Protection by ministerial decree (Case C 181)
8 juin 1989
Classification of the castle
Classification of the castle 8 juin 1989 (≈ 1989)
Enhanced protection (Case C 706)
Aujourd'hui
Aujourd'hui
Aujourd'hui Aujourd'hui (≈ 2025)
Position de référence.
Heritage classified
Substantial parts of the communes (Case C 181): entry by order of 8 December 1981; Remaining parts of the castle (Case C 706): classification by order of 8 June 1989
Key figures
Didier Rouyer - Owner
Responsible for the work identified
Origin and history
The castle of Sampigny and its communes, located in the commune of the same name in the Grand Est region, date from the first half of the seventeenth century. This partially preserved monument illustrates the civil architecture of this period, marked by a transition between late Renaissance and early classical styles. The communes and parts of the castle were protected separately: the former were registered by ministerial decree in 1981, while the latter were classified in 1989, highlighting their exceptional heritage value.
The location of the castle at 8 Rue du Parc is documented with satisfactory accuracy (note 7/10). Available sources, including the Merimée and Monumentum database, indicate that the contractor identified for this project is Didier Rouyer. Although the contemporary uses of the site (visits, rentals, accommodation) are not specified in the data, its status as a Historic Monument makes it an important witness to the local heritage of the Meusian.
The legal protections applied to the remaining parts of the castle (cadastre C 706) and the communes (cadastre C 181) reflect a desire for targeted conservation. The Meuse, a Lorrain department integrated today in the Greater East region, includes among its architectural treasures this type of buildings, often linked to the seigneurial or bourgeois history of the first modernity. The lack of details about sponsors or specific historical events invites us to consider this monument as a generic example of 17th century rural aristocratic habitat.
Announcements
Please log in to post a review