Crédit photo : photography taken by Christophe.Finot - Sous licence Creative Commons
Announcements
Please log in to post a review
Timeline
Temps modernes
Révolution/Empire
XIXe siècle
Époque contemporaine
1800
1900
2000
1825
Initial A. Robert project
Initial A. Robert project 1825 (≈ 1825)
Neoclassical plan with central audience room.
1827-1841
Construction phase 1
Construction phase 1 1827-1841 (≈ 1834)
Realization of the ground floor by A. Robert.
1846
Final completion
Final completion 1846 (≈ 1846)
Added floor by J.-B. Martin.
12 mai 1999
Registration Historic Monument
Registration Historic Monument 12 mai 1999 (≈ 1999)
Protection of the palace and its courts.
Aujourd'hui
Aujourd'hui
Aujourd'hui Aujourd'hui (≈ 2025)
Position de référence.
Heritage classified
Palais de Justice (Box AB 201): Registration by Order of 12 May 1999
Key figures
Auguste Robert - Departmental architect
Designer of the initial neo-classical project.
Jean-Baptiste Martin - Bisontin architect
Author of the extension with floor.
Origin and history
At the beginning of the 19th century, the judicial institutions of Lons-le-Saunier were dispersed: the court sat in the town hall, while the justice of peace, prisons and the gendarmerie occupied the former convent of Cordeliers. Faced with this fragmentation, the department acquired land adjacent to the wood market to build a coherent set of courthouses, prison and gendarmerie. This ambitious project was entrusted to departmental architect A. Robert, who in 1825 proposed a neo-classical building on the ground floor, inspired by Durand's models, with a central audience room.
The work, begun in 1827, was completed in 1841 for the initial part. However, the addition of the civil court proved necessary, leading to the adoption of the project of the bisontin architect Jean-Baptiste Martin. He predicted a floor on both sides of the central hall, bringing the construction to its final completion in 1846. The palace adopts a grid square plan, with four inner courtyards, and today retains most of its original arrangements, although few decorations remain. The building, owned by the department, was inscribed in the Historical Monuments by order of 12 May 1999.
This courthouse is part of a broader context of the reorganization of post-revolutionary judicial institutions, marked by a desire to centralize and modernize public facilities. Its construction reflects the architectural standards of the time, combining functionality and republican symbolism, while meeting the growing needs of structured justice. The choice of the neo-classical, sober and orderly style illustrates this dual ambition: administrative efficiency and representation of state authority.
Announcements
Please log in to post a review