Crédit photo : Marianne Casamance - Sous licence Creative Commons
Announcements
Please log in to post a review
Timeline
XIXe siècle
Époque contemporaine
1900
2000
13 juillet 1926
Registration for historical monuments
Registration for historical monuments 13 juillet 1926 (≈ 1926)
Official protection of the belfry by order.
Aujourd'hui
Aujourd'hui
Aujourd'hui Aujourd'hui (≈ 2025)
Position de référence.
Heritage classified
Belfry: inscription by order of 13 July 1926
Origin and history
The belfry of Dieulefit, also known as the Clock Tower, is an emblematic building of the commune of Dieulefit, located in the Drôme department, in the Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes region. This monument, whose exact period of construction is not specified in the available sources, is a local architectural and historical symbol. It was listed as a historical monument on 13 July 1926, reflecting its heritage importance recognized by the French authorities.
The belfry, owned by the commune, is located at 1 Place Abbé Magnet, in the heart of Dieulefit. This type of monument, typical of French towns and villages, historically served to speed up the daily life of the inhabitants thanks to its clock, while playing a role of surveillance and reporting. In the region, belfry was often associated with commercial and craft activities, reflecting the social and economic organization of local communities.
Available sources, including Wikipedia and Monumentum, indicate that the belfry of Dieulefit is referenced in the Mérimée database, a documentation tool for the French architectural heritage. Although details of its origin or major transformations are not explicitly mentioned, its inscription in 1926 underscores its historical and cultural value. The location of the monument, noted with average accuracy, allows to situate it in an urban setting marked by its history.
No information is provided on the historical characters associated with this belfry, nor on any specific events that would have occurred there. The data focus mainly on its protection and location, without addressing more anecdotal aspects or precise architectural details. This reflects a sometimes limited documentation for monuments of modest size, but no less important for local heritage.
Announcements
Please log in to post a review