First archival record 1414 (≈ 1414)
Aveu de Château-Gontier pour Moiré.
XIXe siècle
Reconstruction of the castle
Reconstruction of the castle XIXe siècle (≈ 1865)
Current building with gallery and tower.
Aujourd'hui
Aujourd'hui
Aujourd'hui Aujourd'hui (≈ 2025)
Position de référence.
Key figures
Abbé Angot - Local historian
Author of references on Moiré.
Famille Trochon - Unifying owners
Reunite fief and domain.
Origin and history
The castle of Moiré, located in Coudray in the department of Mayenne, finds its origins in a medieval fief mentioned in 1414 under the name of domain, fief and belongings of Moiré. This fief, moving from the seigneury of Château-Gontier, imposed two months of custody on its holders. The archives reveal spelling variations over the centuries: Moëré (1559), Moueré (1584), or Le Moiray on Cassini's map, reflecting its toponymic and administrative evolution.
Before its unification under the Trochon family, the estate seems to have been divided, as Abbé Angot suggests. Archivist traces (Departmental archives of Mayenne, series E and B; National Archives, Series P) attest to transactions and legal mentions between the 15th and 18th centuries, without specifying successive owners or possible conflicts.
The present building, rebuilt in the 19th century, has a characteristic architecture of this period: a north gallery with an unobstructed view, a balustrade overhanging all the time, and a central pavilion flanked by a hexagonal tower to the west. These elements contrast with its feudal past, where the site was primarily a place of defense and seigneurial obligations.
The castle is today a testimony of the transformation of medieval fiefs into modern aristocratic residences, while maintaining links with its ancient history through archives and toponymy. Its location, 2 km north of the village of Coudray, makes it a local landmark in the Mayen landscape.
The main sources, notably the Dictionnaire historique de la Mayenne (Angot & Gaugain, 1900-1910), underline its importance in the seigneurial network of the region, without providing details of its daily life or its occupants after the 19th century. The archives cited (E. 61, E. 69, B. 2.356, etc.) remain the key references for any in-depth study.
The possible confusion with another homonymous fiefdom in the Sisters recalls the complexities of local land history, where the names of places could designate separate but geographically close entities. This ambiguity illustrates the challenges posed by medieval sources to historians.
Announcements
Please log in to post a review