Logo Musée du Patrimoine

All French heritage classified by regions, departments and cities

Château de Montveran à Culoz dans l'Ain

Patrimoine classé
Patrimoine défensif
Demeure seigneuriale
Maison forte
Ain

Château de Montveran

    Montée du Château 
    01350 Culoz-Béon
Château de Montveran
Château de Montveran
Château de Montveran
Château de Montveran
Crédit photo : François GOGLINS - Sous licence Creative Commons

Timeline

Bas Moyen Âge
Renaissance
Temps modernes
Révolution/Empire
XIXe siècle
Époque contemporaine
1300
1400
1500
1600
1900
2000
14 mai 1316
Treaty of Pierre-Châtel
1er quart XIVe siècle (vers 1316)
Initial construction contested
1433
First written entry
8 mai 1498
Authorization of patibular forks
8 septembre 1584
Marriage of Philiberte de Luyrieux
20 septembre 1946
Registration for Historic Monuments
Aujourd'hui
Aujourd'hui

Heritage classified

Château de Montveran : inscription by order of 20 September 1946

Key figures

Pierre de Luyrieux - Lord of Culoz and Montveran Suspected commander of the castle in 1316.
Louis de Savoie - Lord of Bugey and Vaud Opposing the initial construction.
Guillaume de Luyrieux - Lord of Montveran (late 15th) Obtained patibular forks in 1498.
Philiberte de Luyrieux - Last heiress Luyrieux-Montveran Transfer the fief by marriage in 1584.
Symphorien d’Angeville - New Lord by Covenant Philiberte's husband in 1584.
Samuel Guichenon - Historician (17th century) Author of key archival sources.

Origin and history

The Château de Montveran is an old fortified house built in the 15th century (although sources evoke a possible origin from 1316 by Pierre de Luyrieux), then restored in the 19th century. It stands on the town of Culoz, in the Ain, at the end of the Montveran rock, overlooking the old large road from Belley to Seyssel. The site was strategically positioned at the western edge of the village, incorporating defensive elements such as mâchicoulis, round towers and a talute base. An aqueduct and a stone reservoir, remains of the seigneurial mills, still remain near the access driveway.

The seigneury of Montveran, detached from that of Culoz at the beginning of the 14th century, was an apanage of the cadets of the family of Luyrieux. Pierre de Luyrieux, seigneur of Culoz and Montveran, erected the strong house in 1316, sparking a conflict with Louis de Savoie, seigneur of Bugey, who challenged this construction without his permission. The dispute was resolved by a treaty signed on 14 May 1316 at Pierre-Châtel, authorizing the continuation of the work on condition of vassality towards the Duke of Savoy. This treaty involved local figures such as Jacques de Saint-André, prior of Belley, and Berlion de Rivoire, seigneur of Rochefort.

In the 15th century, the seigneury of Montveran, with rights of high, medium and low justice (including the last torture), was strengthened by the erection of patibular forks in 1498, authorized by the Duke of Savoy for Guillaume de Luyrieux. The land remained in the line of the Luyrieux-Montveran until Philiberte, who passed it on by marriage in 1584 to Symphorien d'Angeville. After several estates, including that of Antoine de Champier (bailed by Bugey), the fief passed to the d'Angeville until Joseph, who died without a will around 1770. His property was then divided between the Balme, Pailly and Fléchère families, the latter still owning in the 19th century.

The first definite written mention of the castle dates from 1433 under the name Castrum Montisverani, followed by other historical images such as Montverant (1493) or Le chasteau de Montveran (1650). The building, partially preserved, consists of a rectangular house flanked by round towers and peppers, with an adjacent stair tower. It was listed as a historical monument on 20 September 1946, recognizing its heritage value linked to medieval military architecture and the seigneurial history of Bugey.

The archival and genealogical sources, such as the works of Samuel Guichenon (The History of Bresse and Bugey, 1650), attest to Montveran's strategic and legal importance. The castle embodied the local seigneurial power, with extensive rights (justice, mills, forks), while being an issue in the rivalries between the noble families of the region and the house of Savoy. Its aqueduct and hydraulic infrastructure also illustrate its economic role in the exploitation of surrounding resources.

External links