Erection of the Cross 1715 (≈ 1715)
Date engraved on the base
1801
Restoration
Restoration 1801 (≈ 1801)
Mentioned by registration
13 février 1929
MH classification
MH classification 13 février 1929 (≈ 1929)
Registration for historical monuments
Aujourd'hui
Aujourd'hui
Aujourd'hui Aujourd'hui (≈ 2025)
Position de référence.
Heritage classified
Hambot Cross, near Temple Village (Box ZO 66): entry by order of 13 February 1929
Key figures
Information non disponible - Sponsors or artisans
Not mentioned in sources
Origin and history
The Hambot Cross is a cross of road located in Guillac, Morbihan (Bretagne), near the so-called Temple. Built at the intersection of the Sabraham and Lower River roads, it dates from the 16th and 17th centuries. This granite monument is distinguished by its round barrel decorated with vegetable sculptures, typical of Breton religious art of the period. Its base bears partially illegible inscriptions, including the dates 1715 (erection) and 1801 (restoration), engraved in subsequent interventions.
The cross is a monolithic armorial cross, i.e. cut into a single block of stone. The Christ she wears would be a reproduction of an older model, as suggested by her style. Under his feet, an armored shield attests to his connection with a local family or seigneury, although his exact identity is not mentioned in the sources. The cask, of octagonal section according to some descriptions, contrasts with the round version mentioned elsewhere, perhaps reflecting various modifications or interpretations over the centuries.
Classified as a historical monument by decree of 13 February 1929, the Hambot Cross illustrates the rural religious heritage of Brittany. Its location near a crossroads and a watercourse highlights its ancient role as a spiritual and geographical landmark for travellers or pilgrims. The successive restorations, especially that of 1801, bear witness to its lasting importance for the local community, despite the erosion of the original inscriptions.
The available sources (Wikipedia, Monumentum) highlight its architectural and historical interest, but leave pending details such as the identity of the sponsors or the precise meaning of the coat of arms. The accuracy of its location is considered poor (note 5/10), inviting further research to refine its mapping. Today, it remains a silent vestige of the devout practices and the Breton lapidary craftsmanship of Ancien Régime.